What the document covers
The interpretation distinguishes changes to object-clause wording from renumbering alone. Even correcting wording may constitute an alteration requiring the relevant statutory process.
Specific requirements and implications
The interpretation distinguishes pure renumbering from a change to the substance or wording of an objects clause. Renumbering that changes cross-references can still affect the objects. A resolution addressing objects should be confined to that alteration and follow section 33's filing route; a genuinely non-substantive renumbering follows section 26. The distinction protects the notice and challenge rights attached to an objects amendment, rather than treating all constitution edits alike.
Official source
A concise, independent Apex Gateway guide based on the official English source, not a reproduction of the complete document. Consult the original for full conditions, exceptions and subsequent updates.
Read the official PDF ↗