Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: [email protected]
Taxes · PDF

Ruling 10/2024: Tender Premium as an Early Redemption Fee

The issuer’s purchase of outstanding QDS before maturity was treated as early redemption; IRAS classified the premium and specified conditional exemptions.

Source checked · 11 October 2026 · Document date: 2 Dec 2024 Advance ruling · case-specific

Issuer, notes and tender offer

A Singapore-incorporated issuer had issued QDS under a multicurrency debt programme. It sought to buy outstanding notes before their maturity and invited holders to offer all or some notes for cash under an invitation memorandum.

Separating premium from principal and interest

The purchase consideration was 10x% of principal plus accrued interest; the percentage was anonymised. The tender premium meant the amount exceeding principal after excluding accrued interest. Principal, accrued interest and tender premium therefore should not be treated as the same component.

Why the fee was an early redemption fee

IRAS concluded that buying the existing notes under the offer constituted early redemption. The tender premium was a fee payable by the issuer on that early redemption and therefore fell within the section 13(16) definition of an early redemption fee.

Conditions for concessions

The treatment was subject to sections 43H and 13(2F) and the QDS Regulations where applicable. The source also lists sections 13(1)(ba), 13(1)(zk) and 45A(2B)(a). Neither a premium label nor the presence of a tender offer alone establishes all the governing conditions.

Three outcomes in the ruling

The premium paid or deemed paid to non-resident holders would not attract withholding tax under section 45A(2B)(a). Holders could obtain section 13(1)(ba) and 43H exemptions and concessions. Individuals could receive the section 13(1)(zk) exemption, excluding income through a Singapore partnership or from carrying on a trade, business or profession in Singapore.

Publication date and scope

This summary explains the IRAS advance ruling published on 2 December 2024. The ruling binds the applicant and the specified transaction only. Another taxpayer cannot assume that a similar arrangement will receive identical treatment. IRAS does not revise published ruling summaries when legislation or its interpretation changes. The provision numbers and conclusions below describe this dated source.

Official source

This article independently explains the substantive contents of the official PDF, including the relevant conditions, procedures and annexes. The linked document remains the authoritative source for its original wording, and later changes should be checked separately.

Read the official PDF ↗
Contact Us