Company, shareholder and constitution
Singapore-incorporated limited liability Company A had ordinary and preference shares. All preference shares were held by overseas Entity Z, recorded as a preference shareholder in A’s ACRA business profile. A’s constitution prohibited dividends other than out of profits.
Limited voting rights
Preference holders could vote only on voluntary winding-up or variation of rights attached to specified shares and conferred on them. Each preference share carried at least one poll vote on those resolutions. Limited ordinary voting rights did not by itself make the instrument debt.
Profit-linked dividends and priority
The gross preference dividend equalled an anonymised x% of annual net profit, unless the board proposed a lower recommended rate no less than anonymised y% of net profit. With no distributable profit, no preference dividend accrued or was payable. Preference dividends ranked ahead of ordinary-share dividends or distributions.
Further profits and liquidation
Apart from those payout rights, the shares did not participate further in profits. On liquidation or return of capital other than a purchase, assets available for members were distributed to preference and ordinary holders proportionately to their respective shareholding percentages on an equal-ranking basis.
Why the instrument was equity
Balancing the features, IRAS treated the shares as equity: they were shares under the Companies Act 1967 (2020 Revised Edition); Z was recorded as a shareholder; and the terms indicated ownership. In particular, the constitution gave holders no right to demand redemption or require distributions. The source does not establish a general rule for every preference-share design.
Dividend, deduction and withholding results
The distributions were therefore dividends for Singapore income tax purposes. They were not deductible to A and attracted no Singapore withholding tax when A paid them. The ruling identifies section 10(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act 1947 (2020 Revised Edition) as relevant.
Publication date and scope
The source is the IRAS ruling published on 1 December 2022. It binds only the applicant and specified transaction. IRAS need not give another similar transaction the same treatment and does not update published summaries for later legislative or interpretive changes. This article retains the dated source’s provision numbers and factual limits.
Official source
This article independently explains the substantive contents of the official PDF, including the relevant conditions, procedures and annexes. The linked document remains the authoritative source for its original wording, and later changes should be checked separately.
Read the official PDF ↗