Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: [email protected]
Taxes · PDF

Ruling 5/2022: Business Trust Notes and QDS Related-Party Conditions

The 1 April 2022 business-trust ruling addresses debt features, related-party control and the alternative QDS primary-launch tests for three noteholders.

Source checked · 11 October 2026 · Document date: 1 Apr 2022 Advance ruling · case-specific

Trust, sponsor and note subscription

The issuer was trustee of an unregistered business trust. Its Singapore-listed sponsor had one subsidiary as fund manager and another as one of three unitholders; the other two unitholders were unrelated to the sponsor. All three subscribed to property-acquisition financing notes in their trust-unit proportions. None, including associated entities, held issuer shares or vice versa, shared directors with it, or shared non-public shareholders with it.

Fixed interest and deferral

Interest was fixed, unrelated to profits and paid quarterly in arrears. With notice, the issuer could defer all or part; arrears earned additional annual interest as though principal. Junior payments and capital dealings were restricted while deferred, as were non-pro-rata capital dealings on parity obligations. Release required redemption of all notes, full arrears and additional-interest settlement, or extraordinary holder approval.

Term, ranking and holder register

The direct, unconditional, unsecured subordinated notes ranked below senior creditors, equally with specified discretionary-payment parity instruments and ahead of junior obligations including ordinary trust units. Maturity was X years after issue, redeemable at principal unless earlier extended or dealt with. Extraordinary resolution could extend by Y years or another agreed date. X and Y are not disclosed. Holders were in the noteholder register.

Control and alternative launch conditions

IRAS found the issuer unrelated to all noteholders under 13(16): none controlled the issuer or vice versa, and no common person controlled both. The source states a launch condition as either issue to at least four persons, or at least 50% of the issue not beneficially held or funded directly or indirectly by issuer-related parties. Three holders therefore did not necessarily fail qualification; the alternative related-party test mattered.

Classification, remaining requirements and deduction

IRAS classified notes as debt under 43H(4) and regulation 2, with ordinary and additional interest as interest on indebtedness. QDS status and 43H/13(1)(a) relief still depended on the other regulations and 13(2)/13(16) requirements. Deduction under 14(1)(a) required examination of debt purpose and fund use for issuer taxable income, section 14 compliance and no other prohibition; only legally due-and-payable interest was deductible.

Historical scope

Summary 5/2022 was published on 1 April 2022 using the Income Tax Act 1947, 2020 Revised Edition. It refers to paragraphs 5, 7 and 9 of the hybrid-instruments guide. The ruling is transaction-specific and is not updated for later law or interpretation changes.

Official source

This article independently explains the substantive contents of the official PDF, including the relevant conditions, procedures and annexes. The linked document remains the authoritative source for its original wording, and later changes should be checked separately.

Read the official PDF ↗
Contact Us