Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: [email protected]
Taxes · PDF

Ruling 7/2021: Subordinated Notes with Deferred Interest

IRAS’s 1 July 2021 ruling explains why subordinated notes remained debt despite discretionary interest deferral, and which conditions governed investors’ qualifying debt securities relief.

Source checked · 11 October 2026 · Document date: 1 Jul 2021 Advance ruling · case-specific

The questions submitted

Advance Ruling Summary 7/2021 considered debt classification under section 43N(4) of the then Income Tax Act and regulation 2 of the Qualifying Debt Securities Regulations. It separately considered whether ordinary interest, unpaid interest and the extra amount accruing on that unpaid interest were interest on indebtedness. The applicant sought investor QDS treatment, assuming all other qualifying conditions were met.

Issue price, membership and return

The notes were issued at their full principal value and listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited. Holders were absent from the issuer’s membership register and had no statutory right to attend or vote at shareholder meetings. They received a fixed interest rate, paid every six months in arrears, unrelated to the issuer’s profitability.

Deferral and restrictions on junior payments

The issuer could postpone scheduled interest and could also postpone unpaid interest again. Deferred interest continued to earn interest at the prevailing rate. While arrears remained unsettled, payments and capital transactions on junior obligations—including sinking-fund contributions—were restricted. Full settlement of the arrears, or an extraordinary resolution of noteholders permitting the transaction, was needed to lift the relevant restriction.

Maturity, redemption and insolvency ranking

The notes had a maturity date, although the issuer could redeem them in specified circumstances. Redemption covered principal and interest accrued to redemption, including unpaid interest and the additional amount. Arrears had to be settled at the earliest relevant trigger: redemption, specified events or winding up. The unsecured subordinated notes ranked equally among themselves; on winding up they ranked behind other creditors but immediately before shares.

IRAS’s classification and conditional relief

IRAS concluded that the features taken together supported debt classification. All three interest components were treated as interest on indebtedness. Holders could obtain the concessions under section 43N and the exemption under section 13(1)(a), subject to the governing requirements in sections 43N, 13(2) and 13(16) and the QDS Regulations. Debt classification alone did not establish compliance with every QDS condition.

Historical scope and further guidance

The source refers readers to paragraph 5 of the IRAS guide on income tax treatment of hybrid instruments for classification factors. This ruling binds only its applicant and specified transaction; IRAS need not give another similar transaction the same result. The 2021 summary is not updated for subsequent law or interpretation changes. It does not make a separate ruling approving the issuer’s expense deduction.

Official source

This article independently explains the substantive contents of the official PDF, including the relevant conditions, procedures and annexes. The linked document remains the authoritative source for its original wording, and later changes should be checked separately.

Read the official PDF ↗
Contact Us