Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: info@acggroupsg.com
News directory →

NEWS · IRAS · Tax Crime

Company Director Sentenced to 3 Years’ and 8 Months’ Jail for Evading GST and Providing False Reply to IRAS

IRAS publication date:

Case and status

Lau Zhen Zhou, sole shareholder and director of Safety Marine Management, was convicted on five GST-evasion charges and one false-document charge. He received three years and eight months in prison and S$3,213,828.09 in penalties; 14 similar charges were considered.

Facts, amounts and outcome

Five false GST returns during 2017–2018 involved approximately S$1.1 million of GST evaded. In November 2018 Lau answered audit enquiries with fabricated documents. The release explains the enhanced GST-evasion sentencing framework: harm and culpability include the tax amount, planning and duration of offending. This is the conviction follow-up to the July 2021 release announcing charges; figures for proceeded charges must not be confused with the wider earlier allegation.

GST fraud consequences described by IRAS

The release distinguishes genuine input-tax recovery from deliberate false returns: overstated input tax, omitted output tax and fictitious transactions can constitute GST evasion. The cited consequences on conviction include a penalty of three times the tax undercharged, a fine up to S$10,000 and/or imprisonment up to seven years. These are statutory possibilities described in the release, separate from the actual sentence or allegations in this case.

Disclosure, reporting and rewards

IRAS encourages taxpayers to correct past errors and report suspected tax malpractices. The release says disclosure may be considered when deciding enforcement action; it is not a blanket promise of immunity. Where the release describes informant rewards, qualifying information leading to otherwise lost tax recovery may attract 15% of recovered tax, capped at S$100,000, at IRAS’ discretion. Informant identities are kept confidential. Use the official release links for its reporting and disclosure channels.

Official source

This report is independently written from the IRAS release dated above. Case status, policy announcements and historical figures refer to that release.

Read the complete IRAS release ↗

More news

Contact Us