Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: info@acggroupsg.com
News directory →

NEWS · IRAS · Tax Crime

Sole-proprietor to pay penalty for omission of income

IRAS publication date:

Case and status

Staffing Network proprietor Pauline Tan Siew Hoon pleaded guilty to five incorrect-return charges for YAs 2009–2013. She declared S$444,633 although actual net income was S$1,748,058, causing S$172,261 of tax undercharged.

Facts, amounts and outcome

The court imposed S$344,522 penalties and a S$17,500 fine. A GST-registration charge was considered in sentencing. Tan managed the accounts, received customer payments and was the bank account’s sole signatory; turnover crossed S$1 million in 2009 without notification. Responsibility for business records and tax reporting applied to the proprietor who controlled the business, not only to a hired bookkeeper or adviser.

Disclosure, reporting and rewards

IRAS encourages taxpayers to correct past errors and report suspected tax malpractices. The release says disclosure may be considered when deciding enforcement action; it is not a blanket promise of immunity. Where the release describes informant rewards, qualifying information leading to otherwise lost tax recovery may attract 15% of recovered tax, capped at S$100,000, at IRAS’ discretion. Informant identities are kept confidential. Use the official release links for its reporting and disclosure channels.

Official source

This report is independently written from the IRAS release dated above. Case status, policy announcements and historical figures refer to that release.

Read the complete IRAS release ↗

More news

Contact Us