Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: info@acggroupsg.com
News directory →

NEWS · IRAS · Tax Crime

Employees of Jeweller Convicted for Conspiring in GST Tourist Refund Fraud

IRAS publication date:

Case and status

Six Abiraame Jewellers employees were convicted over 80 conspiracy charges concerning approximately S$15,282 tourist refunds. The case related to five claimants convicted earlier for jewellery-invoice refund fraud.

Facts, amounts and outcome

Claimants bought or obtained other customers’ invoices and jewellery tags near Serangoon Road shops, then supplied passports to employees to generate eTRS tickets. Staff knew the claimants were not the actual purchasers. The annex’s individual proceeded-count and fine details are tabulated below. The release explains that tourist refunds require eligible tourists to purchase and export their own goods; selling receipts or knowingly issuing tickets for someone else’s purchases can amount to assistance in fraud.

Tourist-refund conditions and examples

The release treats the scheme as a refund for an eligible tourist’s actual purchases taken out of Singapore. Buying another customer’s receipt, using someone else’s passport or returning refunded goods to a local person can defeat those conditions and create offences. Retailers and helpers can also face action for their participation. The eTRS tickets, airport procedures and examples in older releases describe the system at publication; current operational details remain on IRAS’ official guidance.

Disclosure, reporting and rewards

IRAS encourages taxpayers to correct past errors and report suspected tax malpractices. The release says disclosure may be considered when deciding enforcement action; it is not a blanket promise of immunity. Where the release describes informant rewards, qualifying information leading to otherwise lost tax recovery may attract 15% of recovered tax, capped at S$100,000, at IRAS’ discretion. Informant identities are kept confidential. Use the official release links for its reporting and disclosure channels.

Annex: six employees’ outcomes

PersonTotal / proceeded / considered countsProceeded refund amount (S$)Fine (S$)
Arumugam Chelladurai30 / 8 / 222,046.7512,000
Kulamani Ganesan7 / 2 / 5569.553,000
Manickavasagam Saravanan20 / 7 / 132,011.1010,500
Pang Wei Koon2 / 1 / 1428.501,500
Murugesan Saravanan14 / 4 / 101,572.786,000
Shanmugam Sampathkumar7 / 2 / 5903.393,000

Fine: S$1,500 per proceeded charge. Conspiracy amounts may overlap.

Official attachments and further guidance

Official source

This report is independently written from the IRAS release dated above. Case status, policy announcements and historical figures refer to that release.

Read the complete IRAS release ↗

More news

Contact Us