Corporate Services for Your Business in Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

Scan to contact us on WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: info@acggroupsg.com
News directory →

NEWS · IRAS · Tax Crime

Two Men Charged for Perpetrating a $181 Million GST Missing Trader Fraud

IRAS publication date:

Case and status

Two men aged 40 and 73 were due to be charged on 5 August 2025 over an alleged GST missing-trader scheme using four shell companies and approximately S$181 million of sham sales during November 2017–April 2018. Each faced four fraudulent-trading charges.

Facts, amounts and outcome

The younger man allegedly submitted three GST refund claims attempting to obtain S$11.8 million, forged a supplier invoice to secure GST registration and obtained over S$140,000 through three false tourist-refund claims. Additional charges concerned attempted cheating, forgery and cheating. The release explains potential sentences only if convicted. It also describes denial of input tax plus a 10% surcharge where a business knew or should have known its supply was part of missing-trader fraud.

How the missing-trader arrangement works

The upstream trader invoices a domestic buyer for goods plus GST but does not remit the collected tax. Intermediate businesses provide a chain of invoices, and the final exporter claims purchase input tax while recording a zero-rated export. Where the upstream tax is missing, paying a downstream refund causes a loss to the revenue. Some cases use nonexistent goods; others repeatedly circulate goods through imports and exports. The case amounts above describe this particular release, not every missing-trader arrangement.

Due diligence and input-tax exposure

The release warns businesses to investigate the commercial substance of purchases and respond to suspicious arrangements. For supplies that a business knew or should have known were part of missing-trader fraud, the cited rule denies input tax and adds a 10% surcharge on the amount denied. Supplier paperwork alone should not replace checks on actual goods, delivery and the commercial purpose of a transaction.

Official attachments and further guidance

Official source

This report is independently written from the IRAS release dated above. Case status, policy announcements and historical figures refer to that release.

Read the complete IRAS release ↗

More news

Contact Us